I started doing gender audits of my reading in 2011 and have done one each year - see 2011, 2012. My reasons for doing this can be found in my first post snipped below:
Some time in March1 this year{2012] I did a gender audit of my reading. I had been listening to those subversive women at Galactic Suburbia and I really wanted to see how I did.
Now prior to conducting the audit I had a fairly high opinion of myself. I have no obvert preferences for male writers over female, and I thought on the whole the gender split would probably be fairly close, say 60/40 in favour of men.
How
wrong
I
was.
As a feminist friendly male reader I had a gender split of 82/18.2 So I set about making a conscious effort to read female writers, especially for my recreational reading as opposed to my official reviewing.[read on]
Now I am doing this one early, mostly as a check on myself, as it’s been a busy year with work and a podcast to run. I have had to let some focus drop. So without too much focus on what I am picking up to read, I wanted to see if other factors had skewed my reading in anyway.
So as of today the breakdowns are as follows with last years graph below:
So you’ll note at this point that I have read more collections that feature a mix of genders and that the gender balance of Male and Female authors is more evenly split. I’d have to dig a bit deeper into the actual titles to examine the effect of say major publishing houses versus small publishers on that balance ie does more big publishing titles that I get for review skew the data towards more male authors read.
At this stage I am ok with the results, I like to aim for a 60/40 split in favour of female authors to help correct the situation that occurs in major reviewing publications.
I still had to perception though that I was reading far more female authors than I have. Interesting.
Did you enjoy this post? Would you like to read more? You can subscribe to the blog through a reader, by Email or Follow me on twitter.