Sep 10, 2013

To SMOF or not

100_5434 Paul Cornell has just given a rather good apology for his comedy speech on SMOFS and Smurfs.  I didn’t hear the speech as… well..Ustream+ 3G internet.  But he offended some folks who consider themselves SMOFs (Secret Masters of Fandom or Con runners/Organisers) but  he managed to do what many people can’t do these days – offer a sincere apology for that offense.

The post got me thinking though and I have decided to post my thoughts here rather than on Paul’s post because his is an apology and doesn’t really need additional commentary.

The question I ask myself is whether of not SMOF or smof is something that the SpecFic community should continue to embrace as a term.  For the origin of the term you can check out the wikipedia page here.

Now I ask myself – If a community wants to be open and inviting, is requiring some special understanding some extra layer of sub culture language appropriate.  In-jokes are fine for those who are in but I’d argue they present a barrier to those coming to the community from the outside. 

The term covers a multitude of roles, organiser, fan, valued community member.  Indeed I hadn’t heard of it until I had been commenting on the genre for a good 2 years.  What started as an endearing, self referential term that bolstered community seems to have outlived its usefulness.  Or has it?  Is it worth hanging on to the term out of deference to its place as part of the development of fan convention running or is it time to consign it to history?

I guess I am a fan of recognising those who contribute to the community in an open, easily understood way, for the benefit of  new fans.  I also wonder if this is a something particular to Northern Hemisphere cons.  Because its only in reference to American and UK cons that I have heard the term or… perhaps I am still on the outer? 80

Your thoughts?

Comments (5)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I was thinking that inclusive traditions are best but also if we have a special jargon, insider language and mores then we need to do a good job of communicating that.
I've only ever heard SMOF used in a derogatory context (or more specifically, in blog posts complaining about SMOFs being jerks, mostly). I've always taken it to mean the fandom gatekeepers, even if they're not presenting themselves as such, and hence it's the object rather than the term itself that strikes me as negative.

I'll second you on it being more of an American thing, too. It think the Australian community is much more inviting and, quite frankly, I'm not sure I want to have too much to do with US fandom. (Not sure about UK, I have less knowledge and hence opinion there.)
My recent post Hal Spacejock: Safe Art by Simon Haynes
That was my first exposure to the term as well. Which is in the back of my mind when I am thinking about whether or not it works.
Note: I have been reliably informed that the term SMOF is used in Australia - hmmm.

Post a new comment

Comments by

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...